|
Political Commentary
Government
sponsored Terrorism
The Evil Gender
War.
The Sal Cino Story On The Ministry
of Children and Families, Police, courts and other files coming forth
from video to audio on police investigation and their reports to health
officials, all which showed the abuse of power on an innocent man. (Takes
time to post them) And for protesting the Ministry of Children and
Families this is how the MCF justifies removal of children off those who
are not guilty of anything
________________________________________________________________________
Interesting that the Ministry of
Children and Families can state this, "What ever Mr. Cino's grievances
there can be no justification in a civilized society for this kind of
personal attack on individuals who are required by law and the court to
act in difficult and conflict ridden circumstances. The Ministry invites
Mr. Cino to bring his complaints forward in a manner consistent with the
respect and courtesy owed by all citizens."
But when Sal was falsely accused
by the Ministry did they act this way they stated, with the respect and
courtesy owed by all citizens." , No, and I had a first hand look in a
meeting I was in, how two social workers and those that supervised him,
acted towards Sal, disrespect, personal attacks on him, and treated
him like a convicted criminal with out the benefit of a court
trial.
Sal Cino will continual to fight
there lies, and will continual to Protest, and see that their crimes
against himself and his child are know to the world.
Now that the Ministry has made
threats of charging him for harassing the Ministry,
What would you do if you were
falsely accused?, I know that I would be in their faces for as long as
needed to be to make sure my name was cleared of these
allegations.
E-mail summery from Sal
Cino
----- Original Message ----- From: Sam Cino Sent:
Sunday, January 23, 2005 10:40 AM Subject: Victoria corrupt judicial
system 1999.doc
I arrived in August, I believe in 1999 in Victoria BC to visit and spend time with my
only child. The only address I had
of my ex-wife was a PO box number, of which I mailed her a letter via express to
arrive the next day. The letter
states that I am in Victoria and would very much want to spend time with
my child. The next day I make an emergency application to appear in court, which was the next day before
Judge
Edwards.
I stated that I had just arrived in
Victoria to see my child and I am being denied access. I also state that I
have a receipt of the letter I mailed to her PO Box
address. The judge at the time
orders that I mail
another letter to her to appear in court.
I was shocked that judge
Edwards did nothing for my child and I'm just to prolong my pain and
suffering, he postpones it for another date so that I can appear before
another judge?????
Next week I believe I appeared before judge Fraser and
this time my ex-wife was in
court . After reviewing the
application , Judge Fraser
ask my ex wife
Elisabeth Cino, did you not receive
a letter via express in your mail box? Yes my ex-wife
answered. My ex-wife was
making excuses, when the judge interrupted and said Miss Elizabeth you live by the PO box number ,
so than you die by the PO box number. Just scary words by Judge Fraser who turns it over to another
incompetent judge, because he refused to deal with the matter at
hand.
Another week later again before Judge Edwards who
postpones it to another judge!!!!
This time I appear before Female Judge Quijano , with both myself and ex-wife
presents, she sets aside dates for
my access to my
child. Mad Quijano also states that if I am denied access again to make an application for
contempt of court to appear before her and to state that I should apply for custody of
my child and also set aside
dates for my ex-wife to be incarcerated.
After a month long wait, I finally see my child.
Access was 2 or 3 times a wk. Sometimes I had a witness with me at the pickup
and drop off of my child at a shopping mall.
It wasnt long after I was denied access again and I
brought the ex-wife in court to appear
before Judge Mad Quijano. Where
on the set orders of Mad Quijano who had stated before that I Salvatore Cino get custody of our child and that Elizabeth
Cino be incarcerated on weekends for contempt of court orders. My ex-wife
drags her ill mother out of her apartment to appear in court to sit at the back of the court room, no
one else was present in the room???
,
Judge Quijano tells me to sit down. Quijano gives my
ex-wife a little tongue
lashing whatever . that children need fathers In any event my ex starts to cry a
river and ask the judge to place a restraining order against
me!!
Which was immediately granted. I was immediately
shocked and I objected to no avail , so, I asked that a restraining order by placed on
my ex-wife it too was granted. In other words judge Mad Quijano had reneged on her
promise to give me custody of our child and to incarcerated my ex-wife.
And that access was to resume as before. I was shocked and in disbelief upon
leaving the courts. The
child's best interest is never taken into account by the judges!! When I judge states that he or she
is worried about the child best interest it is in FACT farthest thing from the
truth!!!!
After a few weeks of dropping off and picking up of my child at the shopping mall
my ex-wife Elizabeth says to me when are you leaving. In not thinking,
said next week. She looked very mysteriously when she said that , for she had a
rolled up magazine in one hand hitting the open palm of her hand walking
slowly and nonchalantly as if
she had something up her sleeve!!! The next day Sunday I go back to the mall same
time in the morning to pick
up my child. My child and her mother were no where to be
seen.
So I immediately make emergency application the next
day Monday morning to appear in court . I appear before judge Melvin and my application states the ordersof Mad Quijano
That I Salvatore Cino hold Elizabeth
Cino in contempt of court , that I get custody of my child and that my ex
be incarcerated in jail as so
order by judge mad Quijano. One thing is for sure no judge ever holds a
woman in contempt of court orders and place her in jail and reversing
custody. Only fathers are in contempt and go to
jail???
This ignorant judge refuses to deal with the grave
matter at hand thus abusing my child and me. He asks me to deliver a
letter to my ex-wife to appear in court I believe the next day. Again I
was shell shocked that courts orders by any judge are never up held thus
again making all judges child abusers.
So on and so on it goes, until I start to get falsely
accused of committing crimes on my child. The government and the ex-wife
decided it was the best way to get me out of the way!!! From then on, I
spent more time defending myself from the sick and perverted claims of
these people, until the police and others cleared myself of all charges.
Still todate I being denied my child, by this sick women Elizabeth
Cino.
______________________________________________
In British Columbia where Government child
abusers and Fathers Bashers, use false allegations and PAS to justify
removing children off fathers.......
They can't hide the truth forever.....these
government thugs
News story more photos and political
commentary coming soon on this issue of abuse of power
Mark Storms and Mary Castleman Social
Workers in C/F
PHOTO SECTION OF MINISTRY
TAKING PHOTO'S OF SAL PROTESTING

Ministry Women taking photos of Sal Cino. It
seems Sal was told to stop his protesting, and stop trying to prove he was
innocent, of what his ex-wife, Elizabeth Cino and the MCF falsely accused
him of, or he will never see his kid again... Turns out, they jerk him
over anyhow.

The Ministry Stooge, and their
Government Office, where they made sure they refused to abide by "court
orders" because they think and believe, "they are above the
law"....
Back East where Sal Lives

Sheila Copps is another deadbeat political
sponge
----- Original Message
----- From: Sam Cino
Sent: Wednesday, March 19,
2003 4:02 PM
Protest in January 2003
against Attorney general David Young of Ontario, corrupt policy's in
seeing that women's issues are the ones that only heard of and
taken care of. To hell with rights of children , fathers and
grandparents. In Feb. 2003 there was a meeting with Senator Ann
Cools, Roger Galloway and MP ???? in the riding of
Mississauga . About 100 people show up.
Discussing Gov't child abuse by judges, lawyers and Children Aid Society
and Bill C 22 Things are only getting
worse....
God bless our children Salvatore
Cino

Tandem - Canada's
Cosmopolitan news, art and sports
paper |
In pursuit
of deserved fatherhood |
|
March 31 - April
7 | by Paola Bernardini
An army of divorced
fathers is requesting modifications to the Divorce Act. Every
year in Canada more than 70,000 marriages go awry. In addition
to mothers who cannot get alimony from their ex-husbands,
there are fathers who ask for custody of their children. They
want the law amended to allow prosecution of those parents who
falsely accuse their previous partners of psychological abuse
and sexual harassment in order to prevent them from seeing
their children, or who try and estrange the children from the
other parent. These men would like for the law to become
similar to Italian rules, which state that the parent
entrusted with custody of the children who does not encourage
the children to establish a stable relationship with his/her
former spouse commits a crime: this was reaffirmed on March
13, 2000 by the Italian Court of Cassation.
This is also what Anne C. Cools,
Liberal MP, has been purporting for years through motions to
the Parliament, where she states, with statistics, that false
allegations of child abuse have become a routine trick in
divorces. Anne C. Cools points the finger at those lawyers who
lend themselves to these dirty tricks and even encourage
them. These data are contained in a report entitled "For
the Sake of the Children" presented by the Special Joint
Committee on Child Custody and Access to Attorney General Anne
McLellan in December 1998. The minister replied that she
needed three years to examine the recommendations and verify
the feasibility of eventual interventions by the Federal
government, also considering Provincial
jurisdictions.
MP Cools battle is shared by
Reform MP Paul Forseth, from British Columbia, whos coming to
Toronto on April 1 (10:30 AM, at All Saints Church, 2850 Bloor
St. W.) and will take part in a conference organized by FACT
(Fathers Are Capable Too), an association of parents of both
sexes, fighting for childrens rights and custody-related
issues and which maintains that children need both parents
even after a separation or divorce. Paul Forseth, Justice
Critic, was a member of the Special Joint Committee on Child
Custody and Access, and during the meeting will illustrate the
work done through testimonies by 525 people and a voyage
across Family Courts. The report suggests that the Federal
government should review the Divorce Act, which has been
untouched since 1997; but no signal came in spite of the
promises made by the Attorney General on the occasion of the
Throne Speech.
MP Forseth will talk about the
tragedy of divorced fathers who are prevented from seeing
their children, in connection with the latest suicide, that of
34-year-old Darrin Bruce White, from Prince George, BC, who
hung himself on March 12 after a judge repealed his long legal
battle to get the custody of his four children. The discussion
will focus on negated custody, the lack of a clear law and
other problems facing divorced parents and their
children.
"Minister McLellan cannot wait
any longer for passing amendments to this law," says Arthur
Lowe, vice president of the Victoria Mens Centre, another
group of divorced parents from British Columbia supporting the
initiative of Toronto FACT. "I will be seeking a meeting with
the new Attorney General of British Columbia to discuss these
matters immediately and to attempt to enlighten the NDP on the
ever deepening crisis in the administration of Family Law. Ms.
McLellan has a lot to answer for
"Every day children in this
country are losing their fathers, figuratively and literally.
Where are the countrys priorities? Something is wrong with
this picture. Chretien should ask for her resignation. Perhaps
a call to Anne Cools would be worthwhile in getting the big
picture message clear and consistent across the country.
Fathers must be left with enough money to live and parent with
dignity; it must be recognized that both parents have an
obligation to financially support their children. Reduction in
[after tax] income should be shared by both parents if their
ability to parent is likely to be impaired. Darrin Whites
death was eminently avoidable. I believe the timely
implementation of the recommendations of the Special Joint
Committee on Child Custody and Access would have prevented his
death."
These are the accusations and
requests that the Victoria Mens Group has always carried
forward. "In our association we have heard many stories, weve
seen many, many desperate people, too," continues Arthur Lowe.
"In most cases the problems are linked to allegations made by
the former spouse, and the corresponding impossibility to see
ones children. A tragedy of enormous proportions. And there
is no way out, unless the very basis of the law is reformed,
and therefore the culture of most Anglo-Saxon women and of
several judges."
Nico Loiacono tells about his
experience with the Victoria Mens Group. "Here in Canada its
not like in Italy, where there are solid principles about
family life and married life, and when you go to the church
you swear to live together till death do us part.
Anglo-Saxon women think differently, and the increase in
divorces proves it. Many women, especially in British Columbia
where a Provincial law grants divorced mothers and single
mothers money and even a house. Being thus advantaged they do
not hesitate to kick their husbands out." Loiacono, in Canada
for 27 years, is a member of the cohort of divorced fathers,
and today hes fighting in support of those who are in the
midst of divorce but do not want to give up the chance to see
their children. He clarifies: "My story is not a desperate
one, because I divorced my wife with no great trauma, but this
does not mean I should not fight to change an old law, full of
pitfalls." Nico, born in the vicinity of Bari, does not stop
at the first obstacle, and is willing to take risks to stick
to his beliefs.
Like in 1973 when, after
graduating at a jewelers school in Valenza Po, he packed up
and flew to Toronto. "Why Canada? Because that way I could
avoid serving in the army; lets say it was a legal way to
dodge the draft, although Ill tell you that I still miss
Italy after all these years. From Toronto I moved to Victoria,
where I worked for some years as a jeweler, then I entered the
construction industry. Brick upon brick, I built up my life,
even on the ashes of my marriage," he adds with a touch of
self-irony.
He says: "Thats why I keep up
my volunteering with the Victoria Mens Group: I want to help
those who suffer and who do not know how to cope with their
problems. For instance, our group supports those who do not
know how to behave in a divorce suit, or how to ask for
custody of their children. We also give them a list of lawyers
with the positive and negative results they got in the past,
so that they can decide whom to turn to, and whom to trust.
Let me exemplify, a man, married for many years, lost his
house even if he was entitled to at least 25 percent of it.
That happened because his lawyer did not tell him to sign some
papers, so his ex-wife sold the house and kept the money. What
would you think of such a lawyer?"
Soon these stories turn to
children. "Children had with Italian women and children had
with Anglo-Saxon women. Here in Canada many women, of course
not all of them I wouldnt like to generalize have a child
with a man, then another with someone else, and so on. Its a
cultural matter, reinforced in British Columbia by the
availability of welfare and grants. The fact that they dump
their mistakes on someone else is not important. You see, it
is not enough to say that the pill did not work, or that
precautions were not taken: whether you admit it or not, this
is a highly questionable way, from both the legal and moral
points of view, to extort a child from a man, whos seen more
as a stranger to be milked for cash than as a father. This
generates jealousies and nastiness, and the children get
estranged from their father."
When he says nastiness he means
allegations of psychological abuse and sexual harassment. "Too
often Ive seen men thrown in jail simply because they had
bathed their kids before bedtime. These accusations have,
unfortunately, become a routine in divorce suits, and the data
speak for itself." This is also shown in the "For the Sake
of the Children" report: in MP Roger Gallaways motion to
amend the Divorce Act, he states that legal battles over child
custody often lead lawyers to encourage their clients to
complain of psychological abuse, and women in particular to
complain about violence and abuse in order to gain the upper
hand in disputes.
"Its a war among miserables,"
Loiacono says, "and when a father divorces in Canada we reach
the paradoxical situation that hes allowed to raise
everybodys children but his own. When a woman accuses her
husband of abuse or harassment, judges forbid him to raise his
child, and if hes lucky the poor father can see them only in
the presence of a social worker. But he can freely raise
someone elses children, because with the same
lightheartedness they use in accusing their former husbands
many women take home strangers and make stepfathers out of
them. Law allows it, and culture as well." Tales continue
on in the case of Salvatore Cino. Born in Racalmuto, in the
Italian province of Agrigento, hes the eldest of six
brothers; his parents moved to Canada when he was five, and
have been living in Stoney Creek, on the outskirts of
Hamilton, ever since. Little Talia, Salvatores daughter,
was born in 1996, and spent her first six months among her
cousins. For more than three years, shes been living in
British Columbia, where her mother brought her after her
divorce from Salvatore. Her paternal grandparents have never
seen her since. Not even on her fourth birthday, one month
ago. But Talia is always in their hearts, and in their dreams
shes playing in their yard, under the peach and apricot
trees, with her school, church and playground across the
street. Talia, like many other kids, is a victim of divorce
laws that all too often forget about feelings. Her father
cannot remember how many complaints hes filed with that BC
Court, where as many times hes been told youll see her
soon or youll be able to have her even four hours a day.
All for nothing.
So last year his case went to
the Supreme Court. Judge E. Robert Edwards declared that Talia
"does not necessarily have to see her paternal grandparents.
Im not convinced that it would be in the girls best interest
to bring her to Ontario and foster a relationship with the
people she stayed with in the first months of her life." This
is what the judge wrote. So the previous court order that
authorized Salvatore Cino to bring Talia in Stoney Creek for
one month, to renew her ties with her grandparents and other
relatives, was voided. And Salvatore fell into despair. "We
got married in 1996 in British Columbia, then my wife
Elizabeth Turudija [41], from Alberta, and I moved to Stoney
Creek. Talia was born, and a few months later my wife went
away, bringing my daughter with her. That was the day my
nightmare began. I traveled to British Columbia so many times,
sleeping in hostels for weeks, and I even had to leave my job
to look for Talia. My ex-wife moved several times, and shes
still on the move. Shes changed her telephone number, in
short shes doing anything she can to keep me from seeing my
daughter even for a hour. All too often justice is hampered:
if a mother does not want a father to see his children, judges
seldom rule against her, unless other factors come into
consideration," says an embittered Cino. He even risked
never seeing her daughter again, when his ex-wife accused him
of abuse. "When we divorced I had to appear six times in
court, and after 20 days I was able to see my daughter. I
accepted to give her $300 as monthly alimony and I could see
my daughter 3 days per week, from 9 a.m. to 7:30 p.m." Dark
eyes, blonde hair, little Talia looks happy in the pictures
Salvatore carries with him at all times. Ten, 20, 30 shots,
all of the girl whom her father regards with bright eyes.
"Then everything crumbled when she accused me of abuse," Cino
continues. "Police investigations began, a psychologist
grilled me. I got very depressed when they brought me in front
of the Minister of Children of British Columbia who forbid me
any contact with my daughter." Months of investigations, then
the accusations fell. The judge recognized Salvatores full
innocence, and reinstated his right to see his daughter, but
in the presence of a supervisor, warning him that if he didnt
behave they would take his girl away forever.
Statistics
favour mothers |
| DIVORCES
Marriages in Canada have
steeply declined in the last few decades, and the
divorce ratio has been steadily increasing since the
late Sixties. Before 1968 few divorces were filed in
Canada; with the Divorce Act of 1968 (and its amendment
in 1985) the foundations for legalization were laid. The
55 divorces per 100,000 people of 1968 had become over
300 by the late Eighties. In 1990 there was a slight
decrease, and by 1996 they were 241.
Canadas highest divorce
ratio is to be found in British Columbia and Alberta. In
1996 the ratio in BC was of 281 per 100,000, while in
Alberta it was of 270. Another Province where a high
ratio was recorded was Quebec (249), while PEI only had
174. Ontario and Quebec have shown strongly decreasing
trends, and New Brunswick a slightly decreasing one.
PEI, Nova Scotia, Manitoba and Saskatchewan moved the
other way, and Newfoundland shows a strong
increase.
CHILD CUSTODY When couples with
children divorce, mothers stand better chances than
fathers to get custody of their kids. In 1995, for
instance, judges assigned the children to their mothers
in 65 percent of the cases. Fathers only got them 11
percent of the time. In the last few years, however,
consensual custody agreements have increased, and in
1995 21 percent of the divorces were "amicable," against
1 percent in 1986. At the same time, the number of
children involved in divorce litigations decreased:
while in 1982 they had been over 65,000, in 1995 they
numbered 48,000.
SINGLE PARENTS The number
grew in the past decades. In 1996 there were 1.1 million
single parents, more than double the 1971 figure
(478,000). By far, the majority of them are composed of
women. In 1996, divorced mothers represented 83 percent
of the total, almost a million in Canada (945,000). This
is a 20 percent increase from 1991.
In the same period, the
number of single fathers increased by 16 percent, from
165,000 to 192,000. Currently, about one fifth of the
Canadian families with children (19 percent) has a
father living out of the household: up from the 1991 16
percent, the 1981 14 percent and the Sixties less than
10 percent.
| | |
|
|
|